Piranha 3DD
Oh, I wish I liked this more...
Also at Channel 24
Also at Channel 24
What it's about
After the
calamitous events at Lake Victoria, the prehistoric piranhas set
their sites on a new target: Big Wet, a water park that is set to
open just in time to draw massive crowds for the start of spring
break. It's up to the daughter of the greedy and corrupt owner of
Big Wet to stop her father from opening the park and causing an even
bigger massacre than the one that occurred the summer before.
What we thought
Thanks to Chrissie
Hynde and The Pretenders, we already know that there's a thin line
between love and hate, but who knew that the line awesome and awful
would be thinner still. When I reviewed Piranha 3D a couple of years
ago, I noted that it was about as good a piece of unapologetically
exploitative trash as you could hope to find. It was the sort of the
film that the badder it got, the better it was.
Here we are, less
than two years later, and its sequel is already upon us. Once again
its mixture of gore, boobs and self-aware silliness is just as
unapologetic, just as trashy and just as exploitative as it was in
the first film – if not significantly more so – and yet, Piranha
3DD fails miserably at capturing even a fraction of its predecessor's
grotty charm.
It wasn't going to
be easy to replicate the first film's surprisingly deft balance of
sleaze and likeability, but it's still pretty shocking to consider
how far and how quickly this franchise has fallen with just its
sophomoric effort – especially since it sticks so closely to the
formula of its predecessor.
Yes, as the title
implies, its bigger and brasher than Piranha 3D, but Piranha 3DD
seemingly redresses the balance by being even more aware of its own
silliness and even more willing to poke fun at itself. And, to be
fair, it might smack of opportunistic money-grabbing but, for all of
its gleeful blood-letting and sexual objectification, it never feels
truly mean-spirited or hateful.
The film isn't at
all truly objectionable or obscene (even puritanical Middle America
doesn't seem to have much to say on the matter), it's just total
rubbish and more than a little dull. It comes across as less a full
on sequel to Piranha 3D and more of a pale remake. Remakes are one
thing but remakes of remakes? How could this not have ended badly?
What's really odd
about Piranha 3DD though isn't that it just retreads on ground
already covered, but that its attempt to improve, so to speak, on the
original by upping the ante on the sex, the violence and jokes has
backfired in the most peculiar of ways.
It would make
sense for its more “extreme” sensibilities to push Piranha 3DD
into levels of tastelessness that would be too much for most
audiences to digest. What has happened instead though, is that the
film's attempts to push the bad-taste envelope has made it less
successful as exploitative trash than the relatively “toned down”
original.
It may be more
gory but the gore is completely undermined by being too over the top
to buy into (a single piranha should not cause your head to explode
just by knocking into it, no matter how mutated it is) and is let
down further by some terribly unconvincing CG effects. It may be more
self-aware and it might pack in more jokes but that doesn't help when
most of the humour falls absolutely flat – not least of which is
David Hasslehoff's dreary extended cameo, which only goes to prove
that The Hoff is far less funny in reality than he should be in
theory.
Piranha 3DD may
get a few browny points for its likeable lead (Danielle Panabaker)
and it may work for people who either haven't seen Piranha 3D or are
less discerning with their trash-cinema than I am, but when not even
a full-on bonkers Christopher Lloyd performance and lots and lots of
gratuitous nudity can't save your shameless b-movie from stinking, it
might be time to rethink the formula for the inevitable 3DDD.
Comments
Post a Comment