Dead Man Down
Again, I'll have the Channel 24 link up if and when they decide to post it...
And here it is.
And here it is.
What it's about
Viktor is a man
out for revenge against the crime empire that killed his wife and
child but things get complicated when he meets Beatrice, the woman
living across from his who has her own scars and her own thirst for
revenge.
What we thought
Dead Man Down is a
film that unfortunately lives down to its rather lackluster title,
despite having a number of things very much in its favour. It isn't a
terrible film by any means, but by resolutely refusing to live up to
its own potential, it is a very disappointing one.
Revenge stories
are some of the most archetypal and, therefore, most overplayed
stories around. They also belong to a genre that was so perfectly
perfected by William Shakespeare in Hamlet that they still live in
the Bard's shadow, no matter how many centuries have passed. In the
same way that Romeo and Juliet still defines romantic tragedies,
Hamlet still lurks in the shadows of all revenge dramas.
As such, it's
pointless to expect anything really new from the genre. Instead,
revenge films rise and fall according to how well they understand the
the appeal, as well as the conventions, of the genre in which they
exist. More than anything else, what makes a good revenge story is
that is more about how the act of revenge – or at least the journey
towards it – affects the wronged protagonist than how it affects
the person who he or she is pursuing. The very best revenge stories
understand that by seeking revenge, the protagonist starts to become
more and more a reflection of the object of his revenge.
Here's the thing
about Dead Man Down: it seemingly understands all this, but it
somehow fails to put its understanding into action. At every turn, it
looks like the film is trying to explore the moral and spiritual
impact on a basically good man who is driven to revenge, especially
when it adds the twist of having his journey mirrored by the woman
with whom he begins to fall in love, but the film never quite reaches
its mark.
It's problems
certainly aren't with its excellent cast who, aside for a tonally out
of place performance from Terrence Howard, manage to more than do the
material justice – and, to be fair, the characterisation throughout
the film is largely pretty strong. Similarly solid are the film's
cinematography and production design. There really is no two ways
about it, somewhere between the script by J.H. Wyman and Niels Arden
Oplev's direction, the film simply fails to connect on either
storytelling or, more pertinently, emotional levels.
Oplev's work on
the Swedish-language version of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo was
notable mainly for his ability to give that film a very icy feel that
fit its location perfectly, though it sometimes undermined the story.
The same is pretty much true here but with significantly more
disastrous results.
He never manages
to recapture the heated emotion of the rape and revenge scenes of The
Girl With the Dragon Tattoo here as the entire film feels entirely
too coldly emotionally detached to ever come close to adequately
conveying the intensity for which the story called. Revenge stories
don't work if they don't make the audience feel what its protagonists
are going through so just on this level Dead Man Down is an utter
failure.
To make matters
worse though is that, like The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, despite
being relentlessly bleak and humourless, certain elements still feel
horribly out of place tonally – none more so than the film's
climax, which effectively turns the film into a not very good action
flick.
It's long, it's
dreary and it fails completely to adequately capture its own story's
emotional core and not even good intentions and a better cast can
save Dead Man Down from almost instantaneous forgettability in a
genre that is far too overstuffed to forgive such a sin. It simply
ain't good enough.
Comments
Post a Comment