The Colony
A movie so boring, I can barely be bothered to post my review.
And yes, I realise I'm way behind again but look out for an Amazing Spider-man 2 review coming very, very soon.
This review, however, is also up at Channel 24.
And yes, I realise I'm way behind again but look out for an Amazing Spider-man 2 review coming very, very soon.
This review, however, is also up at Channel 24.
What it's about
After a second ice
age devastated the earth, humanity took to living in underground
bunkers called colonies. When Colony 7 receives a distress call from
Colony 5, their leader heads up an expedition to investigate. What
awaits them, however, is something far more sinister and deadly than
they could ever have imagined.
What we thought
The Colony is yet
another of those D-grade, direct-to-video turkeys that have somehow
managed to get a cinematic release in this country, while, of course,
some genuinely good films are left out in the cold to make their way
through select video stores and movie festivals. That this
direct-to-video turkey was also released in cinemas State-side
doesn't change how unwelcome it is.
Straight off the
bat, though the movie gets more and more insufferable as it goes
along, the Colony starts off pretty badly, as it wears its obvious
influences on its sleeve and steadfastly refuses to do anything even
remotely interesting with them. As it goes along, it evokes and
outright steals from more classic science fiction and horror novels,
movies and TV shows than is possible to count. Hugh Howey's Wool
novels are the first and most obvious similarity but by the end, the
Colony pilfers freely from The Thing, Serenity/ Firefly, I Am Legend
and just about any other apocalyptic story you could think of.
But its serious
lack of originality is only the first of The Colony's many, many
crimes. It's incredibly stupid (apparently being a cannibal makes you
super strong – oops, spoiled it, now you don't have to see it -
don't worry, thank me later) and ceaselessly boring, for a start.
Like all the best b-movies, it's very short as it barely clocks in at
ninety minutes but quite unlike the best b-movies, those ninety
minutes feel like a lifetime.
Whether it's
supposed to be a thriller or a horror flick, it's neither remotely
thrilling, nor in any way scary. That it's unoriginal is one thing,
but this sort of thing should at least provide a few thrills and
spills to go with its trashiness but it not only fails to engage, let
alone grip, its incredibly serious, utterly humourless tone makes it
impossible to enjoy on even that most embarrassingly humble of
levels. The best crappy horror flicks are so bad, they're good –
this is so bad, it's simply terrible.
It isn't even
helped by a cast that includes at least two relatively respected
actors in the form of Laurence Fishburne and Bill Paxton. Both actors
look embarrassed all the way through, never bothering to rise above
the rest of a supremely wooden cast. But then, the characters
themselves are so woefully underdeveloped, no one in the cast is
given very much to work with in the first place. Also, while Paxton
could have had some fun with his villainous role, he clearly couldn't
be bothered enough to even do that.
Director Jeff
Renfroe has spent his career making made-for-TV movies and low budget
action thrillers so it's no wonder that the action and cinematography
feel so resolutely un-cinematic but it is surprising how blandly
Hollywood-ized The Colony is. However much I do appreciate that he's
clearly employing physical effects rather than CGI (the bane of many
a modern horror film), where is the energy, edginess or basic
entertainment to go with it? This is small-budgeted, indie-horror so
why does it feel so very, very corporate?
Obviously, it's
not worth a trip to the cinema and you really don't need to bother
paying to watch it on DVD/ BluRay but when it hits late night TV in
what is undoubtedly going to be no time at all, it should at least
act as the perfect cure for chronic insomnia.
Comments
Post a Comment