Rock of Ages
The moment you've all been waiting for... The Amazing Spi- Sorry, no, never mind. You're going to have to wait for next week for that. For now though, how's about a big stupid musical built around 80s hair metal! Hello? Hello? Where'd everyone go?
Also posted at Channel24
Also posted at Channel24
What it's about
Sherrie and Drew
are two young musicians trying to hit the big time on the Sunset
Strip and it's not long before they become involved with each other
and a struggling night club whose owners are just waiting for the one
big gig to save them from bankruptcy.
What we thought
If 1980s
hair-metal/ poodle-rock has one saving grace is that it is daft,
cheesy fun. In the history of rock and roll, it is largely and
rightly considered to be one of the genre's low points and with its
banal melodies, inane lyrics, plodding rhythms and all the edginess
of, well, a poodle, it's not hard to see why. And yet, for all of
that, unlike say, Grunge, it does at least have enough of a sense of
its own ridiculousness to ensure that songs like We Built This City
On Rock and Roll never truly deserve their reputations as “the
worst song ever”.
Rock of Ages is a
musical built around nostalgia for that period of big sounds and
bigger hair and, in the tradition of Mamma Mia and Across The
Universe, it uses the massive rock hits of the time to form some sort
of narrative. Needless to say, this is a disastrous idea. It's
difficult enough to build a story around Beatles songs (great music,
great lyrics) and almost impossible to base a story around Abba songs
(great music, iffy lyrics) but it is sheer, bloody-minded lunacy to
try and tell a story based on 80s corporate rock (bad music, truly
horrendous lyrics).
As such, right
from the outset, the only way in hell that Rock of Ages was going to
work was by tapping in to its music's inherent sense of daft, cheesy
fun. It was never going to be good but it could have been real,
trashy fun. It was never going to be West Side Story (Shakespeare and
Sondheim are going to beat Whitesnake and Jefferson Starship every
time) but it could have been, obviously inferior music aside, a
decent follow up to Mamma Mia. Mamma Mia was, as you may recall, a
truly atrocious film but by revelling in its own insane
ridiculousness, it somehow became one of the most gloriously
enjoyable musicals ever. Sadly, Mamma Mia this film ain't.
The worst thing
about Rock of Ages isn't that it's bad, but that it's so unbelievably
dull. Actually, scratch that: it's not unbelievably dull, it's not
noteworthy or interesting enough to be “unbelievably” anything.
Rock of Ages is – and I don't use this word lightly – blah.
Straight down the line, everything about Rock of Ages is simply
completely lacking, but never lacking enough to so much as approach
becoming a genuine guilty pleasure.
Tom Cruise does a
middling job of playing a self-involved, ludicrous rockstar; Russel
Brand has you missing his character in Forgetting Sarah Marshall,
Alec Baldwin makes you wish you were rather watching 30 Rock and
Catherine Zeta-Jones does an adequate job in a thankless role as a
shrill, fairly revolting rock-and-roll-hating conservative. Even the
always great Bryan Cranston looks like he accidentally stumbled into
the film while waiting for something better to come by. As for the
two “stars” of the film, Diego Boneta and Julianne Hough, they
are sure to have you longing for Christina Aguilera and Zac Efron in
no time, despite being perfectly likeable. In fact, I like pretty
much everyone in the film and yet, I couldn't help thinking all the
way through, where is Pierce Brosnan steam-rolling his way through
Abba's back catalogue when you need him?
And that's just
the performances. The story is crap obviously, but it's crap in a way
that's boring and clichéd, rather than truly memorably horrendous
and Adam Shankman's direction always stays far too close to
tastefully solid for comfort when it should be aiming for gloriously
and tastelessly demented. Remember Across the Universe's nutty
psychedelic imagery, Rocky Horror Picture Show's unrepentant
perversity and Mamma Mia's hilariously silly choreography? There's
none of that in Rock of Ages. No, in Rock of Ages mediocre blandness
rules the day.
As for the music –
that oh so crucial matter of the music - it's still rubbish, but by
replacing the big-headed crassness of the originals with this sense
of smoothed over, slick, seemingly auto-tuned professionalism, it
loses whatever little charm it may have once had. Of course, that's
really kind of emblematic of the film as a whole: what we want is
charming awfulness, what we get is slick mediocrity. And in this
case, that just ain't good enough.
Comments
Post a Comment