Serena
Oh, how wrong things can go.
This review is also up at Channel 24.
What it's about
George Pemberton's
thriving timber empire is threatened by the pressures of the Great
Depression, but when he meets and marries the enigmatic Serena,
things take a turn – but perhaps not in the ways he was expecting.
What we thought
Serena should
really have been something special. Based on a beloved novel, it
reunites the wonderful Jennifer Lawrence with her increasingly
impressive Silver Linings Playbook co-star, Bradley Cooper, for a
thematically rich and complex period-drama, directed by Susanne Bier,
an Oscar-winning Danish filmmaker. And it is something special. As
long as by “special” you mean a stunning and singular example of
a calamity of a film that is infinitely less than the sum of its
parts.
Serena had
absolutely everything going for it but the result is a disastrous
mess and one of the year's most tedious, dirge-like and frankly badly
told movies. It's hard to know where things started to go wrong, but
every aspect of the film – save, perhaps, for the moody
cinematography and unobtrusive score – is an unmitigated disaster.
Cooper and
Lawrence try their best but he is stuck with a character that is
utterly free of personality, let alone depth, while she is stuck
playing the sort of female character that you'd really think people
would have stopped writing a long, long time ago. Serena may seem
like a feminist hero at first with her tough-as-nails,
woman-of-the-people persona but as the film progresses she becomes
more and more cartoonish that by the end she is nothing more than the
worst “screeching, hysterical woman” stereotype imaginable. Even
their chemistry is oddly lacking.
The actual
storytelling of the film though, is even worse. All the lumpen
symbolism in the world can't obscure the fact that the film has an
overly convoluted plot that quickly spirals out of control, shoddy
pacing and no sense of its own tone. It starts off as a slow (oh so
very, very, very slow), brooding drama and ends up as a slow (oh so
very, very, very slow), brooding
pulpy-psychological-melodrama-turned-thriller.
The early parts of
the film are unspeakably dreary but they at least have a sense of
purpose. As the film progresses, however, and the character drama
(such as it is) gives way for a very fruity plot filled with
treachery, insanity and murder, it keeps exactly the same dreary
tone, thereby robbing any of it of its power, never mind its sense of
fun. It's terribly dull as a drama but it's just shockingly ill
judged as a nutty bit of pulp fun – and though the tone may unite
these disparate strands somewhat, that doesn't mean that it's at all
an appropriate fit for most of them.
The novel,
apparently (I haven't read it), is a wonderfully rich and complex
character study that examines everything from the loss of a child to
the socio-economic climate of Depression-era America so it's
presumably the case that it was simply too novelistic to successfully
adapt into a two hour film. The fact that it's taken to so long to be
released certainly bears that out as the reason it was delayed for
enough time for its stars to make at least half a dozen films a piece
in the meantime (and, of course, one together again) was because Bier
could not find a final cut of the film with which she was remotely
satisfied.
It's tempting to
give the film the benefit of the doubt for its sheer ambition and for
all the goodwill that its stars have engendered in the years since
they shot it, but Serena is simply awful.
Comments
Post a Comment